Movie Parliament
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • This House
  • Articles
  • Foreign Affairs
    • Cannes 2017
    • Cannes2016
    • 2016 Oscars Predictions
    • 2015 César Awards
    • 2014 César Awards
    • 2014 French Bloggers Awards
    • Top10 2014
    • 2013 César Awards
    • 2013 Cannes Coverage
    • European Film Awards 2012
    • (50) Films of Summer
    • 2012 Cannes Coverage
    • 2011 César Awards
    • 2011 Cannes Coverage
  • Film History
    • Classic Films
    • Cult Movies
    • Foreign Masterpieces
  • Awards
    • Awards Decade 2011-2020
    • Awards2020
    • Awards2019
    • Awards2018
    • Awards2017
    • Awards2016
    • Awards2015
    • Awards 2014
    • Awards 2013
    • Awards 2012
    • Awards 2011 >
      • FYC - Best 2011 Film
  • Top 50 of the Decade
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007
    • 2006
    • 2005
    • 2004
    • 2003
    • 2002
    • 2001
    • 2000
  • Summer Movie Wager
  • 2018 Most Anticipated

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

12/15/2012

3 Comments

 
Picture
Writers: Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Guillermo Del Toro and Peter Jackson 
Director: Peter Jackson
Starring: Martin Freeman, Ian McKellen, Richard Armitage and Andy Serkis

Review Written By: Michael Dalton 

One of the most apt titles of the year has to be, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. After the immense success of The Lord of the Rings trilogy, it was inevitable that J.R.R Tolkein’s prequel (and superior) book, The Hobbit would be transferred to the big screen. What was not expected however was the long delay which forced original director Guillermo Del Toro to drop out of the project (Leading Peter Jackson to return once more to Middle Earth) and the announcement that one 300 odd page book, would form three films rather than one. What was also not expected was that this film would become the basis for a conversation about the future of cinema and frame rates, with Peter Jackson electing to use this material to pioneer and experiment with 48 frames per second. However despite the cynicism and frustration with the decision to forcefully create a new trilogy and people’s worries regarding 48 frames per second, most were still expecting a great film and a joyous return to Middle Earth. Sadly, once more, many people will be in for an unexpected surprise.

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is simultaneously lazy, self-indulgent and arrogant. The book upon which it is based is a singular, simple adventure story, it is not the epic, sweeping and grand opus that is The Lord of the Rings. Yet with this film and the trilogy it is a part of, Jackson and co. have tried to turn this source into something its not. Akin to how Gandalf and the Dwarves in this film take Bilbo Baggins out of his element and try and turn him into something he’s not, however the film does not fare nor transform as well as its protagonist. This is a film which is at its best when it’s at its simplest, yet far too many times in this film Jackson goes off on self-indulgent tangents that while offer plenty of detail, slow the film down and results in a frequently tedious and dull experience.

This is a film, which feels like it was filmed upon a first draft screenplay, one that had not yet been edited and cut down to size. There are so many scenes in this film which go absolutely nowhere and do not advance the quest or story at hand. For most of this film it criminally lacks a sense of urgency or fun. The Hobbit does not have the same stakes as Lord of the Rings and therefore in taking the same tonal and visual approach as The Lord of the Rings, Jackson is only highlighting this and turns what could have in fact been an advantage into a flaw. This should have been a simple, fun, adventure. Instead it is an incredibly plodding and pretentious affair. While many fans of the source and Tolkein’s world may be overjoyed with the depth and details that this film goes into, they seem to be mistaking detail for quality. At two hours and forty-five minutes, this film takes a long time to not get very far and if you were to ask me what actually happened in the film, I would struggle to tell you. At the end of the day, this is a film, which is unnecessarily long, as it is stuffed with unnecessary detail that damages it as a film and that unnecessarily seeks to connect itself tonally with The Lord of the Rings. Del Toro having to leave this project was one of the worst things that could have happened to it, this film, due to its separate source in every aspect, needed to fell different visually and tonally to what had come before, it doesn’t.

What really bothered me about Jackson’s approach was that it was alienating and degraded the character of Bilbo Baggins. Bilbo is supposed to be our protagonist and hero for this journey, yet for most of the film he felt like an afterthought. One of my favourite moments in the film comes late in the game when Bilbo has his this is why I am here moment, I just wish we had seen more of that progression visually throughout the film. In taking this sweeping approach, Jackson has sidestepped his protagonist and in a sense made it not his story. It’s an insult to the great work done by Martin Freeman throughout the film. The best part of this film, by far, is the scene between Bilbo and Gollum, with their game of riddles. I could have watched that for near three hours and come out wholly satisfied. Everything about that scene was perfect, from the stunning visual work being done with Gollum and his seamless integration into a real-life environment and interaction with real-life figures, through to the individual performances from Martin Freeman and Andy Serkis, to the great dialogue which all too often in this film seems to be spoken in a language that is certainly not English (You must venture to the mountain of blahdeblah and find the stone of jokery so you can find the key of zabadeeda and open the gate of galifiankis) It is telling that the film’s greatest moment, is a simple, playful and dialogue driven scene.

However this film certainly isn’t terrible. Peter Jackson is an incredibly skilled filmmaker and there is no denying that visually this film is a triumph. I love how he decides to only show brief glimpses of the dragon, as well as his handling of certain action set pieces, such as the fight of the mountain giants. The visual effects, the cinematography and the art direction are all top notch. The music is superb and while the film seems to repeat the same piece of music ten times, it’s a great piece of music so why not. On the topic of music, the singing of the dwarves, something that could have gone so wrong, is handled so well that I wish all their dialogue had been sung. The performances are also uniformly solid, however Andy Serkis as Gollum once again steals the show as he did in The Lord of the Rings trilogy. There are great moments of fantasy filmmaking within this, the aforementioned scene with Gollum is perfect, a couple of the action set pieces had me engaged and excited (Although none of the action set pieces in this film will be particularly memorable a couple of months or even weeks down the line) and ultimately the scale and technical accomplishment of the production is something to be admired. Ultimately, in terms of their visual craft and performances they had this film covered, what lets it down is a baggy, lazy, self-indulgent and arrogant screenplay that sucks the simplicity and enjoyment of what should have been a simple and enjoyable tale. This is not a bad movie; the acting, directing and some of the set pieces are too good for it to be completely dismissed. However it is way too long and while by the end it had just about won me over, I was ready for it to end.

A quick note on 48 frames per second, fuss over nothing in my opinion. Anybody saying it’s amazing and the future of cinema is overstating it, however anybody saying that it is unwatchable and the death of cinema is also doing so. As a seventeen year old I may be part of a generation less affected by visual entertainment looking like video games and HD tv, but at the end of the day, like a lot of the film, it just felt pointless, unnecessary and didn’t really take me anywhere.

Picture
Summary: Has moments of greatness, yet ultimately this is a film, which is too long, self-indulgent and takes the entirely wrong approach to its source material.

Rating: 5+/10

Was originally going to give it a 6, however the more I think about this film, the less I like it.

By Movie Parliament Prime Minister,

Michael Dalton 


Disagree with this review? (I know many of you will) give us your thoughts in the comments below

3 Comments
Disagree just a schned
12/14/2012 05:45:30 pm

You could not be more wrong. The film follows the style of fellowship of the ring. There is just a lot that is being slowly built up to reach a climax. I could not disagree more about splitting the book into three films. The attention to detail is what makes this film superb in my opinion. You can argue that some of the scenes did not further the plot in this film but you can be damned sure that they will have a great influence on the plot of the next movie. In short, this review is a joke and I highly recommend that everybody go watch this film, lord of the rings fan or not. Besides, the credibility of this particular reviewer should be questioned after he specifically praised films such as the International and Funny People for their 'creativity'.

Reply
Michael Dalton
12/14/2012 05:58:33 pm

Thanks for the comment Sinan.

Reply
P.I. Staker link
1/14/2013 03:48:36 am

As a LOTR fanboy who still hasn't seen this film (unsurprisingly), I must say that the tantalizing prospect of three films packed full of detail appeals to me. However I must agree with the article and say that this film looked terrible before it even came out... just saying.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Movie Parliament Prime Minister: Michael Dalton

    Minister for Foreign Affairs: Arnaud Trouve

    Minister for History: Leonhard Balk

    Archives

    March 2019
    October 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    January 2016
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012

    Categories

    All
    Brad Pitt
    Chris Hemsworth
    Dredd
    Film Review
    Gangster Film
    Kristen Stewart
    New Release
    Sci Fi
    Sci-fi

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.